8 results for 'cat:"Experts" AND cat:"Employment Discrimination"'.
J. Ray partially grants the ex-police officer's motion to exclude expert testimony in a race discrimination and employment retaliation action against the mayor and the police chief arising after he was fired. The expert, who is also a police chief, may not offer legal conclusions, tell the jury what result to reach or opine as to what legal authority city policies or practices bestow on the police chief. The expert can talk about how industry customs and practices are shaped by legal requirements. The police chief's motion to preclude certain opinions from the ex-police officer's expert law enforcement officials is denied.
Court: USDC Southern District of Georgia, Judge: Ray, Filed On: January 12, 2024, Case #: 4:21cv111, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: experts, employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Hicks denies a request by a nonprofit health care agency to exclude the expert testimony of a physician who treated a fired employee for physical pain and severe depression allegedly related to a physical workplace confrontation leading to her claims of racial bias, retaliation and vicarious liability against her ex-employer. The exclusion of the doctor’s testimony is not warranted. However, he may only testify to his personal knowledge obtained from examining and treating the woman. Any other opinions are specifically excluded and prohibited as he did not submit a report as required by rule.
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Hicks, Filed On: October 13, 2023, Case #: 6:22cv962, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Evidence, experts, employment Discrimination
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Drain grants an employee an extension to file an expert witness list after she claimed an employment agency rejected her applications for certain advertised positions based on sex, race, and age. The motion went unopposed since the agency did not file a response.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Michigan, Judge: Drain, Filed On: June 8, 2023, Case #: 2:22cv12532, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: Civil Procedure, experts, employment Discrimination